9. Summary
Summary
In this concluding chapter, we have delved into the intricate workings and evolving dynamics of courts within the judicial landscape, unraveling the significance and pivotal role that the court system holds within the framework of society. As a cornerstone shaping the very essence of societal order, the American court system stands as pillars of justice, upholding the rule of law, systematically adjudicating disputes through interpretations of law, and safeguarding individual rights.
Throughout our journey, we examined the structure and organization of courts at various government levels, each with distinct jurisdiction and authority. From its historical roots in English common law to the establishment of the Adversarial System, we explored the evolution of a system designed not just to adjudicate legal matters but to contribute to the fundamental fabric of our collective existence. Our analysis of the principles and procedures guiding judicial decision-making emphasized the importance of impartiality, precedent, and due process. Beyond the adversarial system, we discussed alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, displaying the diverse methods employed by the courts to administer justice and resolve conflicts in a fair and efficient manner. The exploration of the Dual Court System illuminated the delicate interplay between federal and state jurisdictions, showcasing the nuanced legal mosaic that operates to ensure accountability and preserve the separation of powers defining the American justice system.
Furthermore, we have explored the challenges and opportunities facing modern courts in an increasingly complex and interconnected world. As we delved into the courtroom and trial processes, we unraveled the complex web of actors, procedures, and decisions that collectively shape the pursuit of justice. The examination of punishment and sentencing shed light on the intricate mechanisms guiding judicial determinations, emphasizing the far-reaching consequences of legal verdicts on individuals and society as a whole. Landmark court decisions set precedents reaching far beyond their immediate implications, guiding future actions and shaping the course of justice.
In the final analysis, this chapter ventured into the complexities and controversies casting shadows over the justice system, particularly in the context of the “tough on crime” approach. We critically assessed the imperfections within the system, prompting a reflection on the delicate balance between the pursuit of justice and the preservation of individual rights and fairness. Despite the inherent complexities and imperfections, courts remain essential bastions of democracy and guardians of the rule of law, committed to upholding our collective aspirations for the principles of equality, fairness, and justice under the law.
As we conclude our examination of courts, it becomes evident that the significance of the court system extends beyond the confines of legal proceedings. The American court system is a dynamic institution that reflects, responds to, and contributes to the ever-changing landscape of our collective understanding of justice and the rule of law. By delicately balancing the scales of justice, individual liberties, and societal expectations, courts play a crucial role in shaping our society’s pursuit of justice and fairness.
Review Questions
- Describe the functioning of an adversarial court system.
- Define and explain the concept of a dual court system.
- Explain the four types of court jurisdictions discussed in this chapter.
- Outline the structure of the federal court system and elucidate the responsibilities associated with each level.
- Examine the distinctions between a trial court and an appellate court.
- What defines an individual as an indigent defendant?
- Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the jury system.
- Explore and elaborate on each stage of a court trial.
- Investigate the purpose and procedures of appellate courts.
- Elaborate on the difference between concurrent sentencing and consecutive sentencing practices.
- Give one example of discriminatory issues in the court process and how it was resolved.
References
Adelman, L. (2013). The adverse impact of truth in sentencing on Wisconsin’s efforts to deal with low level drug offenders. Valparaiso University Law Review, 47(3), 689-707. https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol47/iss3/1/
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. (n.d.). About the Supreme Court. United States Courts. Retrieved April 27, 2024, from https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/about
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. (2021). Federal judicial caseload statistics 2021. United States Courts. Retrieved April 27, 2024, from https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/federal-judicial-caseload-statistics-2021
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. (2023, June 30). Federal court management statistics, June 2023. United States Courts. Retrieved April 27, 2024, from https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/federal-court-management-statistics-june-2023
Associated Press. (2023, May 31). Actor Danny Masterson is found guilty of 2 out of 3 counts of rape in retrial. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2023/05/31/1179285514/danny-masterson-rape-retrial
Babcock, B. A. (1983). Defending the guilty. Cleveland State Law Review, 32(2), 175-187. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2052&context=clevstlrev
Bibas, S. (2006). Transparency and participation in criminal procedure. New York University Law Review, 81(3), 911-966. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/81
Bjerk, D. (2005). Making the crime fit the penalty: The role of prosecutorial discretion under mandatory minimum sentencing. The Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 591-625. https://doi.org/10.1086/429980
Black, K. A., & McCloskey, K. A. (2013). Predicting date rape perceptions: The effects of gender, gender role attitudes, and victim resistance. Violence Against Women, 19(8), 949-967. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213499244
Bourne, H. E., & Benton, E. J. (1913). A history of the United States. Heath & Company. https://archive.org/details/historyofuniteds02bour/mode/2up
Brown, B., & Jolivette, G. (2005, October). A primer: Three strikes–the impact after more than a decade. Legislative Analyst’s Office, California State Legislature. https://www.lao.ca.gov/2005/3_strikes/3_strikes_102005.htm
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024a, April 17). Correctional officers and bailiffs. Occupational Outlook Handbook, U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved April 27, 2024, from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/protective-service/correctional-officers.htm
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024b, April 17). Court reporters and simultaneous captioners. Occupational Outlook Handbook, U.S. Department of Labor. Accessed April 27, 2024, from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/legal/court-reporters.htm
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024c, April 22). Paralegals and legal assistants. Occupational Outlook Handbook, U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved April 27, 2024, from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/legal/paralegals-and-legal-assistants.htm
Bushway, S. D., Redlich, A. D., & Norris, R. J. (2014). An explicit test of plea bargaining in the “shadow of the trial.” Criminology, 52(4), 723-754. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12054
Chaiken, M. R., & Chaiken, J. M. (1984). Offender types and public policy. Crime & Delinquency, 30(2), 195-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128784030002003
Chambliss, W. J. (2000). Power, politics, & crime. Routledge.
Cohen, T. H. (2014). Who is better at defending criminals? Does type of defense attorney matter in terms of producing favorable case outcomes. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25(1), 29-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403412461149
Criminal Justice Standards Committee. (2017). Prosecution function. In Criminal justice standards (4th ed.). American Bar Association. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/ProsecutionFunctionFourthEdition/
Demuth, S. (2006). Racial and ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: A comparison of Hispanic, Black, and White felony arrestees. Criminology, 41(3), 873-908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb01007.x
Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System. (2014, June 12). FAQs: Judges in the United States. Quality Judges Initiative, University of Denver. https://iaals.du.edu/publications/faqs-judges-united-states
Fortino, M. (2021, October 15). Study shows public defenders outperform court appointed private attorneys. Criminal Legal News, 44. https://www.criminallegalnews.org/news/2021/oct/15/study-shows-public-defenders-outperform-court-appointed-private-attorneys/
Frase, R. S. (2019). Forty years of American sentencing guidelines: What have we learned? Crime and Justice, 48(1), 79-135. https://doi.org/10.1086/701503
Friedman, L. M. (2005). A history of American law (3rd ed.). Touchstone Books.
Gabbidon, S. L., Kowal, L. K., Jordan, K. L., Roberts, J. L., & Vincenzi, N. (2008). Race-based peremptory challenges: An empirical analysis of litigation from the U.S. Court of Appeals, 2002–2006. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-007-9027-6
George, T. E., & Yoon, A. H. (2017). Measuring justice in state courts: The demographics of the state judiciary. Vanderbilt Law Review, 70(6), 1887-1910. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol70/iss6/10/
Gertner, N. (2010). A short history of American sentencing: Too little law, too much law, or just right. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 100(3), 691-708. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol100/iss3/4/
Geyh, C. G. (2008). Methods of judicial selection and their impact on judicial independence. Daedalus, 137(4), 86-101. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/54
Gibson, S., Harris, B., Waters, N., Genthon, K., Hamilton, M., Bailey Stevens, E., Moffett, M., & Robinson, D. (Eds.). (2023, October 9). CSP STAT overview. Court Statistics Project, National Center for State Courts. Retrieved December 6, 2023, from https://www.courtstatistics.org/court-statistics/interactive-caseload-data-displays/csp-stat-nav-cards-first-row/csp-stat-overview
Gillman, H. (2001). The votes that counted: How the court decided the 2000 presidential election. University of Chicago Press.
Gordon, S. C., & Huber, G. (2007). The effect of electoral competitiveness on incumbent behavior. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2(2), 107-138. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1335455
Hammer, T. J. (2002). The long and arduous journey to truth-in-sentencing in Wisconsin. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 15(1), 15-18. https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/facpub/136
Hemmens, C., Brody, D. C., & Spohn, C. C. (2010). Criminal courts: A contemporary perspective. SAGE.
Hessick, C. B., & Morse, M. (2020). Picking prosecutors. Iowa Law Review, 105(4), 1537-1590. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3551506
Husak, D. (2008). Overcriminalization: The limits of the criminal law. Oxford University Press.
Illinois Courts. (n.d.). How cases proceed through the courts. State of Illinois. https://www.illinoiscourts.gov/public/how-cases-proceed-through-the-courts/
Jamieson, K. H., & Hardy, B. W. (2008). Will ignorance & partisan election of judges undermine public trust? Daedalus, 137(4), 11-15. https://www.amacad.org/publication/partisan-election-judges-undermine-public-trust
Jefferson, Thomas. (1789, July 11). [Letter to Thomas Paine]. National Archives. https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-15-02-0259
Karch, A., & Cravens, M. (2014). Rapid diffusion and policy reform: The adoption and modification of three strikes laws. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 14(4), 461-491. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24710977
Kieso, D. W. (2005). Unjust sentencing and the California Three Strikes law. LFB Scholarly Publishing.
McCoy, C. (2005). Plea bargaining as coercion: The trial penalty and plea bargaining reform. Criminal Law Quarterly, 50, 67-107. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/clwqrty50&div=9&id=&page=
Missouri Courts. (n.d.). The bicentennial of the Missouri judiciary. https://www.courts.mo.gov/page.jsp?id=174544
Mullen, R., Arbiter, N., Plepler, C. R., & Bond, D. J. (2019). In-prison therapeutic communities in California. Therapeutic Communities: The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities, 40(3/4), 142-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/TC-06-2019-0007
Neubauer, D. W., & Fradella, H. F. (2018). America’s courts and the criminal justice system (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
New Hampshire Judicial Branch (n.d.). How judges are selected. State of New Hampshire. Retrieved December 28, 2023, from https://www.courts.nh.gov/students/guide-new-hampshire-courts/how-judges-are-selected
New York State Unified Court System. (n.d.). 8th judicial district: Court structure. Retrieved June 1, 2024, from https://ww2.nycourts.gov/courts/8jd/structure.shtml
Pisciotta, A. W. (1994). Benevolent repression: Social control and the American reformatory-prison movement. NYU Press.
Roman, D. (2011). Under the Rape Shield: A historical and comparative perspective on the Rape Shield Laws. Working Papers in Feminist Research, UCLA Center for the Study of Women. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0w62h4dp
Sasani, A. (2023, December 12). Kate Cox case: What led to the Texan fleeing the state for an abortion? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/dec/12/kate-cox-texas-abortion-case-explained
Sobel, R. S., & Hall, J. C. (2007). The effect of judicial selection process on judicial quality: The role of partisan politics. Cato Journal, 27(1), 69-82. https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/2007/1/cj27n1-6.pdf
Spohn, C. (1990). The sentencing decisions of Black and White judges: Expected and unexpected similarities. Law & Society Review, 24(5), 1197-1216. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053666
Spohn, C. (2014). Twentieth-century sentencing reform movement: Looking backward, moving forward. Criminology & Public Policy, 13(4), 535-545. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12095
Spohn, C. (2015). Evolution of sentencing research. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(2), 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12125
Texas Judicial Branch. (2023, October). Court structure of Texas. https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1457606/court-structure-chart-october-2023.pdf
Tonry, M. (1995). Malign neglect: Race, crime, and punishment in America. Oxford University Press.
Tonry, M. (1998). Sentencing matters. Oxford University Press.
Tonry, M. (2013). Sentencing in America, 1975–2025. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 141-198. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/671134
Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts. (2011). A guide to Washington state courts (12th ed.). Washington Courts. https://www.courts.wa.gov/newsinfo/content/pdf/CourtGuide2011.pdf
Wilson, J. (2013). Thinking about crime (Rev. ed.). Basic Books.
Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R. M., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. University of Chicago Press.
Wright, J. D., & Rossi, P. H. (1985). The armed criminal in America: A survey of incarcerated felons. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GOVPUB-J28-PURL-gpo81476
Adaptation Notes
Chapter learning objectives were slightly modified to align with CRMJ 1100 learning outcomes. Figure 9.15 was added. Review checks were added throughout the chapter.
